Why Depth of Investigation is the Holy Grail of AI SOC Accuracy

In the race to automate the Security Operations Center (SOC), speed often gets all the glory. Vendors promise "Mean Time to Respond" (MTTR) measured in seconds and AI agents that triage alerts faster than any human analyst.

AI SOC solutions ingest massive volumes of alerts and apply linear logic to triage them. This approach offers the promise of efficiency; tickets are closed, and queues are cleared. However, an AI that operates on surface-level data inevitably creates a deficit in accuracy. It generates false negatives by missing the subtle context that turns a benign-looking event into a critical incident.

For security leaders, the evaluation of an AI SOC must pivot to a scrutiny of its investigative depth. We must ask if the system stops at the first answer or if it possesses the thoroughness to turn every stone before rendering a verdict. Because speed without depth can be catastrophic for AI SOC deployments in production environments.

To understand why depth is essential, the difference between simply verifying an alert and thoroughly investigating an incident must be recognized. Achieving high investigative accuracy necessitates a comprehensive audit of the entire environment related to the alert.

{{ebook-cta}}

Asking Questions Like a Human SOC Analyst - the "Turn Every Stone" Methodology

A human analyst does not investigate in a straight line. They investigate in concentric circles. They widen the scope to understand the full picture. An effective AI SOC must replicate this exhaustive approach.

Rather than following a narrow path triggered only by suspicious findings, the AI should proactively investigate every dimension of the event. It must execute a rigorous, multi-pronged inquiry every single time.

Consider a standard malware alert. A shallow system checks the file hash. A deep system, however, simultaneously interrogates multiple context vectors:

• The Asset: What is the functional role of this device? Is it a developer's laptop or a production server?
• The User: Is the account active? When was it created? Have they generated other alerts in the last 30 days?
• The External Entity: If a domain is involved, when was it registered? Does it have public context or threat intelligence associated with it?
• The Action: Were remediation actions already taken? Was the activity blocked or merely detected?

By asking all these questions upfront, the AI ensures that no potential threat vector is left unexamined.

Accuracy Requires Completeness

The value of this exhaustive data gathering is in the accuracy of the investigation and analysis. Individual data points are rarely smoking guns. They are subtle indicators that only make sense when connected.

A user logging in from a new location might be fine. A domain registered two days ago might be fine. A PowerShell script running on a workstation might be fine. However, when you turn all those stones and look at them together, the picture changes.

If the AI has not asked "When was this domain registered?" and "What is the role of this asset?" it cannot possibly correlate the fact that a Finance server is communicating with a 24-hour-old domain. Shallow systems miss these correlations because they never gathered the data in the first place.

Depth ensures that when the AI analyzes the incident, it is working with a full deck of cards. It identifies the intersection of the user, the asset, and the external threat to form a cohesive narrative.

Evaluating the Investigative Core

When selecting an AI SOC, the vetting process often focuses on integration counts or deployment speed. These are operational necessities, but by no means sufficient. The rigorous evaluation must center on the investigative depth and accuracy of the solution.

Security leaders should scrutinize the "questions" the AI asks. Does the system limit itself to the immediate artifacts of the alert? Or does it automatically expand the scope to audit the user's history, the asset's value, and the external infrastructure?

An AI that does not look at the whole picture is simply a faster way to ignore risk. The value of an AI SOC lies in its ability to be thorough at machine speed. That thoroughness is impossible without depth.

Prophet Security is engineered from the ground up to prioritize investigative depth, moving beyond surface-level triage to perform the exhaustive "Turn Every Stone" methodology described above. This commitment to comprehensive context gathering is why security leaders consistently identify Prophet AI as the agentic AI SOC platform that delivers the highest investigative accuracy. Request a demo of Prophet AI to see it in action.